상대: charliebrowner11 : Patrice o'neal is one of the only men who knew what he was talking about and got to root of the issue he is the only one who goes to the root and actually has a defining philosophy. Kevin Samuel's is a charlatan and Jordan Petereson isnt good either both of them miss the mark. Their are out thougj just harder to find especially now.
리플 원래 댓글 보이기
상대: charliebrowner11 : Lets be real most men are clueless about women not just sexually but in letting them get away with anything because they do not want to lo acess to potential pussy so they let her walk over their balls. Women naturally want strong men and we have an pandemic of weak men. You got men who want to be dominated and pegged by women or they arent really men. They last 2 seconds in bed etc. Reddit or quora does not have knowledgeable people on their but i see people rant their i dont use either of them which is why i suggested it because of the rant. I much rather see men talk about contractions than seeing them enable women and cumming in 2 seconds. This makes me have to work harder cuz now im dealing with women who have a fucked up view about make and i gotta give her options and to think different. Of course field research is paramount, we won't get pussy or be good lovers without it. But I rather deal with the nuisances of men wanting women to contract than men who do not please their women at all and let them do whatever they want. For me that is focusing on the superficial stuff. It is nothing but a red herring to the root of the problem. I think people get hung up in semantics way to much rather than the source of the people and it is why things are ao fucked up now. Many men give up their integrity for some pussy. They do not even no how to eat pussy and the key to it is to focus on the clit. I do agree that many men are weak and pathetic especially nowadays but our focus is different. I rather hear about contractions than a guy failing to make a woman cum because he doesn't know how to eat pussy.
리플 원래 댓글 보이기
상대: Magictouchz : Fuck hanging around or talking to ‘knowledgeable’ men…what sense does that make? Talk to men to learn about about women? No! Go to the source…Talk honestly to women…and they’ll tell you. And fuck reddit, I’ve never really been on reddit but I’m on here and I see ALL of these videos loaded mostly by men talking about contractions because they’re clueless about women’s bodies and sexuality!
리플 원래 댓글 보이기
상대: charliebrowner11 : It depends on the orgasm some women you can see them visibly contract but not for all orgasms. Some you wouldn't be able to tell even if you are inside them. It is an indicatior but not the only way a woman can have an orgasm some women never contract when having one, some do sometimes, and some do it almost all the time. Idk maybe you need to hang around more knowledgeable men. Was not expecting to ever see a rant on this lol take it to reddit next time.
리플 원래 댓글 보이기
Why do men think contractions indicate orgasm? Women’s bodies are similar to men when it comes to orgasms. If men didn’t shoot cum, women would have no idea when men cum. We don’t contract externally, we spasm internally which sends sperm out. Women also orgasm internally…they don’t contract externally. The same muscles that we use to make our dicks move, women can use the same muscles. I guess my point is the only way to really know if a woman is orgasming is to feel the contractions internally.
리플